If you’re thinking about setting up a charity, there’s usually one question that comes up very early on: Should I be setting this up as a charitable trust, or as a charitable company?
It’s a sensible question — and an important one. The structure you choose will affect how the charity operates day to day, how much risk the trustees take on personally, and how easy it is for the organisation to grow over time.
There isn’t a single “right” answer for everyone. The best option depends on what the charity will actually be doing in practice.
Why the structure matters more than people expect?
When people start a charity, they often focus on the cause, the funding, or the services they want to provide. The legal structure can feel like a technical detail. In reality, it shapes things like:
whether the charity has its own legal identity
whether trustees could be personally liable if something goes wrong
how easy it is to:
employ staff
sign contracts
apply for funding
scale up activity later
Getting this decision right at the start can save a lot of time and stress further down the line.
Charitable trusts: simple, but not always flexible
A charitable trust is one of the oldest charity structures and, on paper, one of the simplest. It’s created by a trust deed, which sets out the charity’s purposes and how it should be run. The trustees then hold and manage the charity’s assets in line with that deed.
When a charitable trust can work well
Trusts tend to be a good fit where the charity is:
relatively small and low risk
mainly grant‑making
holding and distributing funds
not employing staff
not entering into many contracts
For charities that exist primarily to manage money or assets for a charitable purpose, a trust can be perfectly adequate.
The upside
straightforward to set up
lighter ongoing administration
only regulated by the Charity Commission
fewer formal governance requirements
The downside
The key point people often underestimate is that a trust does not have a separate legal identity. In practical terms, that means:
trustees may be personally liable for contracts and debts
property and contracts are held in trustees’ names
growth and change can be difficult
updating the trust deed can be slow and restrictive
For charities that plan to stay small and stable, this may be acceptable. For others, it quickly becomes limiting.
Charitable companies: more admin, but more protection
A charitable company limited by guarantee is a company registered at Companies House and then registered as a charity with the Charity Commission. This structure is very common for modern, operational charities.
When a charitable company is usually the better choice
Charitable companies are typically more appropriate where the charity will:
deliver services directly to the public
employ staff or engage contractors
enter into funding or service agreements
rent or own premises
plan to grow over time
Why many charities choose this route
The biggest difference is that a charitable company is a legal entity in its own right.
That means:
the charity can sign contracts itself
it can employ staff in its own name
trustees usually have limited liability
funders and commissioners are often more comfortable with the structure
In other words, it provides a level of protection and credibility that is important once a charity becomes operational.
The trade‑off
more administration
regulation by both Companies House and the Charity Commission
company law requirements alongside charity law
That extra compliance puts some people off, but for many charities it’s a price worth paying for the flexibility and reduced personal risk.
A quick comparison
Charitable trusts tend to suit:
grant‑making charities
asset‑holding charities
simple, low‑risk activities
Charitable companies tend to suit:
service‑delivering charities
charities employing staff
organisations entering into contracts
charities planning to grow
If the charity will be doing more than simply holding and distributing funds, incorporation is often the safer long‑term option.
A quick word on CIOs
Some people are surprised to learn there’s a third option worth considering: the Charitable Incorporated Organisation (CIO).
A CIO offers:
limited liability, like a company
a legal identity in its own right
regulation only by the Charity Commission (not Companies House)
For many new charities delivering services, a CIO combines the protection of a company with slightly less administration. It’s not right for everyone, but it’s often worth discussing as part of the decision‑making process.
So, which structure should you choose?
As a rule of thumb:
If the charity will mainly manage funds or make grants, a charitable trust may be sufficient.
If the charity will deliver services, employ people, or enter into contracts, an incorporated structure — a charitable company or a CIO — is usually more appropriate.
It is possible to change a charity’s structure later, but it can be complex and disruptive. Taking time to choose the right structure at the outset puts the charity on a much firmer footing.
Final thoughts
Starting a charity is about more than good intentions. The right structure helps protect trustees, supports good governance, and makes it easier for the charity to operate effectively.
Getting advice early — particularly around liability, governance, and reporting — can make a significant difference to how smoothly things run as the charity develops.
If you’re considering setting up a charity and would like guidance tailored to your plans, speaking to an adviser with charity experience is a very sensible first step.
Share this post: